Strona główna Prawo Komitet Praw Człowieka Omar Sharif Baban vs. Australia - zastosowanie ograniczenia wolności słowa zgodne z MPPOiP

Od 1 stycznia 2018 r. strona nie jest aktualizowana.

Tematyka wolności słowa została przeniesiona na stronę główną
Helsińskiej Fundacji Praw Człowieka, dostępną na: www.hfhr.pl

Omar Sharif Baban vs. Australia - zastosowanie ograniczenia wolności słowa zgodne z MPPOiP PDF Drukuj Email
 

Facts:

The author of the communication is Omar Sharif Baban, born on 3 May 1976 and an Iraqi national of Kurdish ethnicity. He brings the communication on his own behalf and that of his son Bawan Heman Baban, born on 3 November 1997 and also an Iraqi national of Kurdish ethnicity. The author and his son were detained, at the time of presentation of the communication, in Villawood Detention Centre, Sydney, Australia. The author claims that they are victims of violations by Australia of articles 7, 9, paragraph 1, 10, paragraph 1, 19 and 24, paragraph 1, of the Covenant. The author is represented by counsel.

The author contends that, in Iraq, he was an active member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). On 15 June 1999, the author and his son arrived in Australia without travel documentation and were detained in immigration detention under section 189(1) Migration Act 1958. On 28 June 1999, they applied for refugee status. On 7 July 1999, the author was interviewed by an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA). On 13 July 1999, DIMA rejected the author's claim. On 6 September 1999, the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) dismissed the author's appeal against DIMA's decision. On 24 July 2000, the author, along with other detainees, participated in a hunger strike in a recreation room at Villawood Detention Centre, Sydney. On 27 July 2000, the hunger strikers (and the author's son) were forcibly removed and transferred to another detention centre in Port Hedland, Western Australia.

On 21 September 2000, the Full Court of the Federal Court dismissed the authors' further appeal against the Federal Court's decision. The same day, the authors lodged an application for special leave to appeal in the High Court of Australia. In June 2001, the author and his son escaped from Villawood Detention Centre. Their current precise whereabouts are unknown.


Decision on admissibility :
 

The Committee has ascertained that the same matter is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol.
Concerning the author's claims under article 19, the Committee, even assuming for the sake of argument that a hunger strike may be subsumed under the right to freedom and expression protected by that article, considers that in the light of the concerns invoked by the State party about the health and safety of detainees, including young children, and other persons, steps lawfully taken to remove the hunger strikers from a location giving rise to these concerns may properly be understood to fall within the legitimate restrictions provided for in article 19, paragraph 3. It follows that the author has not substantiated, for the purposes of admissibility, his claim of a violation of his rights under article 19 of the Covenant.


Uchwała Komitetu Praw Człowieka w sprawie Omar Sharif Baban vs. Australia

 
pomorskie zachodniopomorskie warmińsko-mazurskie podlaskie mazowieckie kujawsko-pomorskie lubuskie wielkopolskie łódzkie dolnośląskie opolskie śląskie świętokrzyskie małopolskie podkarpackie lubelskie